!hdr nd>
Both yellow and blue forms exists and live side by side. PYR differes from OGO by color pattern: it vertical barring in the latter half of the body, OGO has horizontal rows of dots along the entire body, PYR only has these at the front.
PYR has been a mystery for ages, described by Radda and Huberin 1979, Seegers in 1980 later deprecated it to a subspecies of OGO without argument. Articles by Eberl (2015) JVDZ (2018) confirm Huber's 1981 analysis of rhe OGO superspecies and validated PYR.
That is PYR is not a subspeces of OGO, rather OGO is a super species, a complex of similar species to which OGO proper and PYR belong, with a handful of similar species from the surrounding region an nowhere else. These fish were originally found in the 1920s but were referred to as suspecies of LUJ, a fish no known photo exists of as of 2018. Huber (1981) gives the history as: The fish collected by the French colonial administrator A. Baudon at the end of the 1920s. These fish were examined by Pellegrin and led to the discovery of a large number of species. Some of these are now considered to be separate species, but at that time they were grouped together. For example, A. ogoense (1930) and A. louessense (1931) were described as varieties of A. lujaeDescribed by Radda and Huber, placed as a subspecues by Segers without justification. Referred to PYR by JVCZ in 2018. Here are Huber's comments from Killi Data:
|